It received a lot of bashing in 2005, the glitzy spec, badly detailed engine, door fitment, lack of opening roof cover (which their C2 had).

Seen today, looking as new with no paint issues as many older Kyos, and in between the primitive simple models that flood the market now, it is rather striking.



I sense shades of Batman here.











Door fitment lamentable indeed... perhaps as on the 1:1.
Does look better in the metal, in the pix there are massive harsh shadows which overpronounce this.
Fliplights absolutely perfect, though.















19 yrs vs last week, same body, two stances.



The 69 4x4 stance is (as period pix show) correct.
But I saw so many lower sitting C3s, dunno if these are all modified later or if the chassis was overhauled by the works.



Size seems right on both.
But they disagree about light cover size and the length of the bonnet.
Guess AA is more correct.



I dislike the pre-war car style wheels on the 69.
The centers extruding the bodywork, so tacky.
More Stutz than Vette.









Which rear end is closer?
The KK fails with the exhaust holes, these shouldn't be there with sidepipes.
Foglights a strange hole addition.





Watch the ride height.



Move over young man.